11 July, 2025
In an increasingly globalized world, international commercial transactions are part of the daily routine for many companies. However, the diversity of legal systems can generate uncertainty […]
1 July, 2025
Arbitration has gained ground as an alternative method of dispute resolution, especially in the commercial and contractual fields, so including an arbitration clause in a contract […]
1 July, 2025
In corporate matters, minority shareholders may find themselves excluded from decision-making bodies, which generates tensions and, at times, legal conflicts. However, the Spanish legal system provides […]
20 June, 2025
Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) serves as the final arbitral authority for disputes in professional sports. But what happens when […]
20 June, 2025
Properly structuring director remuneration is essential to avoid conflicts with the tax authorities and shareholders, and to ensure transparent and lawful corporate governance. The remuneration regime […]
20 June, 2025
The globalisation of civil and commercial relations has increasingly led to situations where judicial or arbitral decisions issued outside Spain must be enforced within its territory. […]
24 April, 2025
The right to information is a fundamental pillar in any capital company, as it allows shareholders to access relevant data concerning the company’s management and economic-financial […]
17 October, 2024
Introduction to International Arbitration In an increasingly globalized world, international expansion is a strategic necessity for many companies seeking to capitalize on new business opportunities in […]
8 March, 2022
The recent ruling of the Constitutional Court of 15 February 2021 has declared that the review of arbitration awards by the High Courts of Justice must be interpreted restrictively, not allowing to review the merits of the case. Furthermore, the judgment holds that the arbitrator's duty to state reasons is not comparable to that required of judicial bodies. This duty is considered to be fulfilled if the reasoning of the award allows to know the criteria on which the decision is based. Thus, the arbitrators' duty to state reasons is more limited in scope than that required to courts.
